Map is not correct for Meteosat (SEVERI) data.

Errors and unexpected results
Post Reply
User avatar
Rick
Posts: 404
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 8:20 pm

Map is not correct for Meteosat (SEVERI) data.

Post by Rick »

A user downloaded AREA formatted data from the EUMETSAT archive. The data was from METEOSAT-8 when it had a subpoint of 9:50:00 East. The navigation routines for McIDAS-V are expecting this value in the second word of the navigation block.
User avatar
Rick
Posts: 404
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 8:20 pm

Re: Map is not correct for Meteosat (SEVERI) data.

Post by Rick »

EUMETSAT has been made aware of the problem and will forward the information onto their archive staff.
User avatar
wstraka
Posts: 66
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:05 pm

Re: Map is not correct for Meteosat (SEVERI) data.

Post by wstraka »

Rick

As an FYI, when SteveW and I used the RSO data for MET-8 (which is at 9.5E) last year, we had to POKE (using Mc-X) the sat-subpoint in to that location. That is a temporary solution while people wait for EUMETSAT to correct their archive, back with mcidas2008

LWU POKE AREA(nnnn) -95000 69

As an FYI, you were on the initial exchange of emails back in March 2009, when I was trying to read the data I got off the DC servers. I forget if it was changed finally in mcidas2009 (i.e if you read in the HRIT it would generate a correct AREA with the right subsatellite point). I had to look through my emails to find this, but it would be something to check as well.
User avatar
mug_admin
Site Admin
Posts: 87
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 9:31 pm

Re: Map is not correct for Meteosat (SEVERI) data.

Post by mug_admin »

Thanks William,

Unfortunately the user did not have McIDAS-X, but using that exact solution, we were able to help him out. Poking word 65 is the correct solution.

Rick
Post Reply